jackson@vistamatt.com +1 619 558 6563 Technical documents Request a sample

Home/Solutions/Waterborne Clear Wood

Solution 1 of 6

High-Clarity Waterborne Matting

For waterborne clear wood topcoats where grain definition and film clarity matter as much as the gloss target.

Typical working window for this solution — verify against your own gloss standard

Waterborne clear matte on oak cabinet — Vistamatt VS660 for natural grain definition without haze

High-clarity waterborne matting covers 3 synthetic amorphous silica grades (CAS 7631-86-9) for waterborne clear wood topcoats, clear sealers and overprint varnish. Particle size D50 across the range runs 3.5–5.3 µm, with BET surface area 138–210 m²/g and oil absorption 178–250 g/100 g. SiO₂ content is 96.7–97.8 %. Grades in this range: VS660, VS651, VS351C. Typical dosage is set by screening in your own system — set the grade first from clarity and texture constraints, then find the loading that meets your gloss target.

Where it applies

  • Waterborne clear wood topcoats
  • Clear sealer and overprint varnish
  • Furniture, doors, flooring

What the solution is built around

For waterborne clear wood topcoats where grain definition and film clarity matter as much as the gloss target. The screening logic starts from the coating system rather than from a single matting figure — resin type, target gloss, application method and the specific problem you are seeing all change which grade should lead.

Matte without haze. Clear without shine.

Recommended grade structure

Each project starts with a lead grade and at least one comparison grade. Running both against your own control in the first round answers more than running one grade twice.

Grades for waterborne clear wood systems
Grade Role Particle size (µm) Application note
VS660 Lead 5.0–5.3 Primary route for high-clarity waterborne clear systems.
VS651 Support 4.9–5.2 Finer balance where smoothness and tactile feel lead the brief.
VS351C Comparison Bridge grade when upgrading from a general-purpose matte system.
Wood coating comparison — glossy vs Vistamatt VS660 matte finish without haze

What to measure in the first round

These are the dimensions that decide whether a grade progresses. Test against your own control sample under production-representative conditions wherever possible.

Verification checklist
Dimension What good looks like
Gloss control Lands in the target semi-matte / matte window
Clarity & haze No whitening, milkiness or loss of depth
Grain definition Natural and legible, not greyed out
Feel & smoothness Free of drag, chalk or coarse texture
Viscosity & storage No thickening, settling or hard pack

Technical support on this solution

  • System review — resin type, target gloss, application method, current issue and incumbent product.
  • Two-sample proposal — a lead grade plus a comparison route, with the reasoning for each.
  • Lab and scale-up — comparison across appearance, process behaviour and storage stability.
  • Troubleshooting — support on haze, drag, thickening, settling and appearance defects.
Before you order samples

Tell us the resin system, the gloss target and standard you measure against, the application method and film build, and what is going wrong today. That turns a sample request into a screening plan with a defined answer.

Screening starts with the system

Resin, target gloss, application method, current problem. We reply with a plan.

Talk to an application specialist
Common questions

Selecting and screening for this system

Which grade should lead a first screening round for waterborne clear wood topcoats?

VS660 is the usual starting point for waterborne clear wood topcoats, at a recommended dosage of 2-4 % on total formulation. Run at least one comparison grade in the same round rather than running VS660 twice — VS651, VS351C cover the rest of the working range for this system. Testing two grades against your own control in round one answers more than testing one grade in two rounds.

How do the grades in this range differ?

Particle size across this range runs VS351C at 3.50 µm; VS651 at 4.9-5.2 µm; VS660 at 5.0-5.3 µm. The finer end (VS351C) scatters less light inside the film and generally preserves more clarity; the coarser end (VS660) creates more surface texture per unit added and reaches a lower gloss at lower loading. Structure differs too: VS351C carries the highest surface area in this group at 210 m²/g against 138 m²/g for VS660, which means it thickens the formulation more at the same loading.

What dosage should I start with?

For waterborne clear wood topcoats, VS660 typically starts at 2-4 % on total formulation. Treat this as a bracket rather than a target: screen three loadings around it and interpolate to your gloss reading. Set the grade first based on clarity and texture constraints, then find the loading that hits gloss — starting from a fixed loading and searching for a grade usually produces something that meets gloss and fails elsewhere.

My gloss is right but the finish has another problem. What do I change?

For waterborne clear wood topcoats, the common issue is haze over dark-stained substrates. Gloss is the easy variable — it is corrected by adjusting loading. What loading cannot correct is clarity, surface texture and dispersion stability, and those are set by the grade. If the current grade meets gloss but fails on one of those, move along the particle size range rather than changing the loading: finer toward VS351C for clarity, coarser toward VS660 for matting efficiency at lower loading.

How should I compare a Vistamatt grade against my current control?

Compare at matched gloss, not at matched loading. Different grades have different matting efficiency, so running a candidate at the incumbent's loading gives a different gloss reading — that tells you about efficiency, which is easily corrected, and nothing about the properties that are not. Find the loading that matches your gloss target first, then compare clarity over your darkest substrate, surface texture by hand, and wet formulation viscosity at that loading.

What do I get with a sample request, and what are the commercial terms?

Samples are free, 200–500 g, with freight prepaid by Vistamatt, and ship in 7–10 working days with a screening plan matched to your system. MOQ is 500 kg per grade for standard grades and 2,000 kg for a custom batch; production lead time is 15–25 days, FOB Xiamen or CIF. Documentation includes a TDS per grade, a generic SDS covering the range, a TSCA compliance declaration, and a COA per batch on request.

Grade recommendations are a starting point for screening. Final suitability, dosage and performance must be verified in the customer's own resin system, at the target gloss and under actual process conditions.